Training · Programmes for teams
3 sessions of 2 hours on the tools your company is already paying for.
The programme is 3 sessions of 2 hours. That isn't a round number or a negotiable minimum. Each session is built to leave something working and the next one builds on top of it, so a cut-down version isn't the same training in less time — it's a different one that doesn't reach the result.
The sessions are hands-on from start to finish, and also bounded. The working time is the one the contract sets. The programme doesn't teach a tool; it teaches your team to operate with the ones they already have open every day.
Nuvnext doesn't deliver training from zero, and that isn't fussiness — it's arithmetic. The programme runs 6 hours. Spend them explaining what a prompt is and there are none left to apply anything.
The three conditions hold together. If one of them is missing, the programme isn't the right instrument yet.
The programme is worked in a group. Each participant arrives with a case from their own area, and the value shows up when you watch the same tool solve problems that look nothing alike. Below five people that doesn't happen, and the format turns into one-to-one advice.
Reports, inventories, timekeeping, price lists. Which tool they live in matters least. What gets automated in the programme goes in and out of that data, so a team that doesn't touch it daily leaves with ideas instead of results.
It is enough that the team has used some tool, whichever one and at whatever depth. What the programme needs isn't mastery — it's the experience of having received a wrong answer and caught it. That distrust is what the judgement we work on in the sessions is built on.
What doesn't change
What gets built for you
Before the first session we look at where the team actually is and which processes are costing them time. The content is built from that, not from a syllabus that repeats identically for everyone.
Two companies of the same size rarely need the same thing. One arrives with an admin team drowning in data entry, another with people already using AI daily who don't know what to trust. The 6 hours are the same, but what gets done with them is not.
That includes the starting point. If the team turns out to be further back than it thought, we adjust the pace rather than leaving people behind.